|
An Act Further Regulating Driver Education and Junior Operators' Licenses |
Minimum License/Permitting Age
- Minimum
age to obtain a learner’s
permit remains 16 years
- Minimum
age to obtain a junior operator’s license remains 16 ½ years
- Minimum
requirements for first time
licensees 18 years and older
remain a learner’s permit
and road test
Driver’s
Ed Requirements
- 30 hours classroom instruction
- 12 hours on-road driving (up from 6 hours)
- 6 hours in-car observing
- 40 hours parent-supervised driving (up from 12 hours)
- Requires
parental participation in 2
hours instruction on driver’s
ed. curriculum, but allows
RMV to issue regs. on method
of participation, only once
every 5 years (this is new from current law)
- Allows RMV to accept 30 hours parent-supervised driving if completed advanced driver training course.
Junior Operator Night Driving Restriction/Penalties
Night driving restriction begins at 12:30 (currently 12AM)
Status quo on primary vs. secondary enforcement
- No driving 12:30 AM-5AM for duration of junior operator licensure, unless accompanied by parent/guardian
- Primary enforcement 1AM-4AM
- Increases night driving penalties
- 60-day
license suspension for 1st
offense
- 180 days for 2nd offense and required attitudinal retraining
- 1 year for subsequent offenses
- Penalties are in addition to existing fine for operating unlicensed (currently between $100 and $200, increased in this bill to between $100 and $1000)
Junior Operator Passenger Restriction/Penalties
- No passengers during first 6 months of licensure, other than immediate family members (current language/no change)
- Increases penalties
- 60-day
license suspension for 1st
offense (currently
30 days)
- 180
days for 2nd offense and required
attitudinal retraining (currently
60 days)
- 1
year for subsequent offenses (currently
90 days)
Learner’s Permit Driving Restrictions/Penalties
- Prohibits
driving under a learner’s
permit unless accompanied
by a licensed driver
21 or older with 1
year or more driving
experience (current
language/no change)
- Also
prohibits driving between
12AM and 5AM unless accompanied
by parent or guardian
who holds a valid license (current
language/no change)
- Punishes
night driving violations
and driving unaccompanied:
- 60-day
permit suspension for
1st offense
- 180-day
suspension for 2nd
offense and completion
of driver attitudinal
retraining
- 1-year
suspension for subsequent
offenses
- Penalties
are in addition to
existing fine for operating
unlicensed (currently
between $100 and $200,
increased in this bill
to between $100 and
$1000)
- Requires
violators to reapply
for learner’s
permit before may obtain
a license
RMV
Notification to Parent
- Requires
RMV to send notification
to parent or guardian
of a junior operator
or learner’s
permit holder under
age 18 for any c. 90
violation resulting
in JOL or permit suspension
- Requires
that notice for 1st speeding
offense contain information
on penalties for 2nd
offense
Junior Operator
and Learner’s
Permit Drag Racing
Penalty
- 1st
offense: 1-year license
suspension and $250 fine
and $500 license reinstatement
fee (current
is fine between $100
and $500 plus 30 day
license suspension)
- 2nd
or subsequent offense:
3-year license suspension
and $500 fine and $1000
license reinstatement
fee (current
is fine between $200
and $1000 plus 180 day
license suspension and
3rd or subsequent offense
is fine between $200
and $1000 plus license
suspension for 1 year)
- Requires
completion of SCARR program,
driver attitudinal retraining
course, and 2nd road
test for license reinstatement
for JOL offenders
- Requires
completion of SCARR
program, driver attitudinal
retraining course and
reapplication for a
learner’s permit
before offender may
apply for licensure
Learner’s
Permit Speeding/Penalties
- 1st
offense: minimum $50
fine, plus additional
$10 for each mph in
excess of 10 mph over
posted speed limit,
plus $50 surcharge (existing
fine) and
90 day permit suspension (suspension
is new)
- 2nd offense:
same existing fine
and 1-year permit suspension (suspension
is new)
- 3rd
or subsequent offense:
same existing fine and
1-year permit suspension (current
law is 3rd or subsequent
within 12-month period:
fine plus 30-day license
suspension)
- Reapplication
for learner’s
permit before individual
may apply for licensure
Junior Operator Speeding/Penalties
- 1st
offense: $50 fine, plus
additional $10 fine for
each mph exceeding 10
mph over speed limit,
plus $50 surcharge (existing
fine) and
90-day license suspension
and completion of SCARR
program (new
penalty)
- 2nd
offense: Fine plus 1-year
suspension and completion
of SCARR program (currently
is fine plus 180-day
license suspension)
- Subsequent
offenses: Fine plus 1-year
suspension and completion
of SCARR Program (SCARR
program is new requirement)
- Also
requires a $500 reinstatement
fee, completion of an
attitudinal retraining
course and 2nd road test
for license reinstatement (currently
$100 reinstatement fee)
Driving Negligently
or Recklessly as a Junior
Operator
- Increases
the minimum 1st offense
license suspension for
junior operators who
drive negligently or
recklessly to 180 days
- Current
law:
- License
revocation upon conviction
for up to 60 days for
1st offense and up
to 1 year for subsequent
offenses within 3-year
period
- Fine
between $20 and $200
or
- Imprisonment
from 2 weeks to 2 years
- $250
assessment
Driver’s
Education
- Requires
all driving schools
to be licensed by the
Registrar. This
includes public and private
high schools, including
vocational and regional
schools as well as driver’s
ed. taught as part of
continuing ed. programs
- Allows
the Registrar to impose
a civil administrative
penalty in addition to
suspension, revocation
or non-renewal of a driver
school or program’s
license for causes allowed
- Requires
the Registrar to establish
regulations for the operation
of driver schools and
programs
- Requires
driver schools and
programs to post a
bond for the reimbursement
of enrollees’ tuition
should the license of
a school or program be
suspended or revoked
before the completion
of a paid course
- Prohibits
all public and private
driver schools and
programs from employing
a person as a driving
instructor who does not
hold a valid driver’s
license and instructor’s
certificate
- Directs
the Registrar to develop
standardized driver education
curriculum to be used
by all schools and programs
- Directs
the Registrar to develop
and administer a standardized
written test to students
enrolled in driving schools
and programs. The Registrar
may use the results of
such tests to issue driver
education certificates
and to measure curriculum
compliance
- Directs
the Registrar to inspect
programs and schools
for compliance
- Establishes
Registrar’s
oversight of driver skills
development programs
(advanced driver training
courses)
Studies
- Junior
Operator Decals
- Creates
13-member study commission
on junior operator
decals
- Members:
Registrar, Secretaries
of Public Safety,
Transportation, A&F,
3 reps, 3 senators,
and 3 governor appointees
representing AAA,
a municipal police
dept. and an expert
in youth safety
- Commission
to convene by September
1, 2007
- Reporting
deadline: June 1, 2008
Drowsy
Driving
- Creates
special commission
on drowsy driving
- Commission
members: 3 reps (2
Democrats, 1 Republican),
3 senators (2 Democrats,
1 Republican), Secretary
of EOT, Registrar,
State Police, MA DA
Assoc., MA Assoc. of
Police Chiefs, and
3 governor appointees
- Reporting
deadline: Dec. 1, 2007
Effective Date
- Enhanced
driver’s
ed. required for junior
operator applicants after
September 1, 2007
- Enhanced
driving penalties apply
to violations committed
after March 31, 2007
All other sections apply
upon effective date of act
<<Back
to Legislative Activity
<<<Back
to Government Affairs |
| |
| |
SJC Upholds Contested Provision of Melanie's Law |
The
state's new law targeting
repeat drunk drivers does
not violate the constitutional
due process rights of defendants,
the state's highest court
ruled on October 25, 2006.
The court also ruled that
it was proper to apply the
tougher law to drunk driving
cases pending when the law
was signed on Oct. 28, 2005.
The ruling upholds the ability
of prosecutors to prove prior
convictions through corroborating
identifying information and
public records rather than
by presenting live witnesses.
Proponents of the so-called prior convictions language had argued that
public records are sufficient to prove prior convictions for the purpose of determining
whether defendants are repeat offenders. Critics of the language, which was added
to the bill following a political uproar over its contents, had claimed that
such records are not always reliable and that the
identities of individuals with the same names could be mistaken.
The court pointed out in its ruling that the new law expands the type of documents that can be used as proof of prior convictions by adding documents from jails or prisons and from the state Registry of Motor Vehicles to court records and certified copies of probation records featuring biographical and informational data. The ruling also points out an "apparent clerical error" in the drafting of Melanie's Law, noting that it appears to have mistakenly replaced a "completely
different provision of the statute concerning the reinstatement of licenses by
the registrar of motor vehicles."
<<Back
to Legislative Activity
<<<Back
to Government Affairs
|

Boosting the Argument for a Primary Belt Law
|
AAA Southern New England Director of Government Relations Arthur Kinsman testified before the Massachusetts House of Representative earlier this year in support of a bill to enact a primary safety belt law. The House subsequently passed the bill and it is now before the state Senate. A primary law would allow police officers to issue a citation if they see an unbuckled driver or passenger. Currently, Massachusetts has secondary enforcement, which means an officer can only issue a safety-belt citation if the vehicle is stopped for another violation. As Mr. Kinsman pointed out, safety belts are the single most effective way to protect motorists and their passengers. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for Americans ages 3 to 33.
<<Back
to Legislative Activity
<<<Back
to Government Affairs
|
| |
AAA Lauds Passage of Tougher Drunk Driving Law
|
|
Photo by Berta A. Daniels
Governor Mitt Romney signs Melanie's Bill into law. To the right of the Governor are Melanie's parents and grandfather.
|
AAA
Southern New England
recently joined Governor
Mitt Romney, legislators,
and victims of drunk
driving to witness
the signing of “Melanie’s Bill,” which is the first major revamping of Massachusetts’ drunk
driving laws since
the .08 Blood Alcohol
Limit and Administrative
License Revocation
was passed in 1994.
Two years ago, 13-year-old Melanie Powell was struck and killed by a repeat offender drunk driver as she walked with a friend near the beach in Marshfield. AAA Southern New England joined forces with Mothers Against Drunk Driving to lobby hard for passage of a comprehensive set of laws that target repeat drunk drivers. Perhaps there were no greater advocates for the law than Melanie’s
family, Tod and Nancy Powell, and her grandfather, Ron Bersani.
“Without Ron Bersani’s relentless lobbying, this bill would not be law,” said Art Kinsman, Director of Government Affairs for AAA Southern New England. “Mr.
Bersani and the Powells have done a great service to the Commonwealth by taking
the pain of their tragedy and allowing it to be used to make the roads safer.”
The law requires repeat offenders to have ignition interlocking devices
installed in their vehicles, forcing them to blow into a breath test machine
before the car will start. The bill also significantly increases the license
suspension penalties for a variety of repeat offenses and mandates an alcohol
assessment for anyone with a blood alcohol level of .15 or above. It creates
a new crime of child endangerment by operating under the influence to be enforced
when transporting anyone 14 or under, and mandates a 24-hour vehicle impoundment
for drivers who refuse the breath test.
The legislative conference committee, which was charged with working out
the differences between the Senate and weaker House versions of the bill, stripped
the bill of a few major provisions, and sent it on to Governor Romney for approval.
In a stunning reversal rarely seen at the Statehouse, Governor Romney refused
to sign the bill and sent it back to the legislature with the provisions restored,
most notably, a section allowing certified court records to be proof of prior
convictions, rather than the current system where prosecutors must produce original
witnesses or arresting officers.
With public and media scrutiny mounting, and Melanie’s family threatening to take her name off the bill, the legislature restored two of the three provisions and the bill became what the governor described as a “95 percent” success. The other restored item was an increase of the mandatory minimum jail sentence for any individual found guilty of manslaughter by motor vehicle to five years. Notable legislative advocates were both the Powell family’s
legislators, Rep. Frank Hynes (D-Marshfield) and Sen. Robert Hedlund (R-Weymouth),
as well as Transportation Committee Chairman Sen. Stephen Baddour (D-Methuen),
and House Minority Leader Bradley Jones (R-North Reading).
At the bill signing, however, the gathering was reminded of the real people who have been killed or injured by repeat drunk drivers. Mr. Bersani read from his granddaughter’s journal, a passage about the day she found the meaning of “beautiful,” as
she wrote of sitting in her backyard appreciating her good life and her nice
surroundings, especially the warm soft breezes that blew across her yard. Melanie
had told her grandmother her goal in life was to be a guardian angel.
“Today there is a warm breeze blowing in Massachusetts, and we know where it comes from, for today a little girl starts her dream job,” said
Mr. Bersani.
<<Back to Legislative Activity
<<<Back to Government Affairs |
|
| |
|
|
Melanie's Bill: Detailed Summary of the Law
Chapter
90, § 12 – Employing or allowing unlicensed operator to operate motor vehicle: The
previous law did not list penalties for
an offense, nor did it contemplate ignition
interlock restrictions. |
|
| Old Law |
Penalty |
| No person shall employ an individual with a suspended license |
No penalty listed
|
No person shall allow a vehicle owned by him or under his control to be operated by an unlicensed person
|
No penalty listed
|
| |
|
| New Law |
Penalty |
No person shall employ an individual with a suspended license
|
1st Offense = $500 fine
2nd Offense = 1 year in the house of correction and up to $1000 |
No person shall allow a vehicle owned by him or under his control to be operated by an unlicensed person
|
1st Offense = 1 year in the house of correction and a fine of $500
2nd Offense = 2 ½ years in the house of correction and a fine of $1000 |
No person shall allow an individual with an ignition interlock restriction to operate a vehicle not equipped with the device
|
1st Offense = 1 year in the house of correction and a fine of $500
2nd Offense = 2 ½ years
in the house of correction and a fine
of $1000
|
| • The Registry of Motor Vehicles may suspend the registration of a vehicle used in the commission of such an offense of up to one year. |
| |
|
Chapter
90, § 23 – Operation
of motor vehicle after suspension or
revocation of license: Melanie's bill
increases the penalties for Operation
After Suspension for Drunkc Driving.
|
| Old Law - Penalty |
New Law - Penalty |
1st Offense: No less than 60 days no more than 2 1/2 years and a fine of $1000-$10,000. Minimum mandatory sentence of 60 days.
2nd Offense: No additional penalty |
1st Offense: No less than one year no more than 2 1/2 years and a fine of $2,500 - $10,000. Minimum mandatory sentence of 1 year.
2nd Offense: No additional penalty |
| |
|
Chapter
90, § 24
A. Intermediate Sanction Language:
The
following language has been stricken
from Chapter 90, § 24: "unless
otherwise sentenced to an intermediate
sanction as promulgated by the sentencing
commission established in chapter four
hundred and thrity-two of the acts
of nineteen hundred and ninety-three."
• No intermediate sanctions
were ever promulgated thus making the
language obscure.
B. Waiting period for a hardship license:
Melanie's bill increases the waiting period ot apply for a hardship license for a first and second offence.
|
| Old Law |
New Law |
1st Offense: Six month waitng period to apply for a hardship license.
2nd Offense: One year waiting period to apply for a hardship license. |
1st Offense: One year waiting period to apply for a harship license.
2nd Offense: Eighteen months waiting period to apply for a harship license. |
C. An ignition interlocking divise is now required on all licenses issued for second or subsequent offenders for a period of two years.
|
| Violation |
Penalty |
Removal of the divice, or failing to have the device inspected, maintained, or monitored on at least two occasions.
|
"An extended period" or
for life. Allows for an appeal of the
registrar's decsions to the superior
court.
|
| At least two attempts to start a vehicle with a blood alcohol level in excess of .02. |
"An extended period" or
for life. Allows for an appeal of the
registrar's decision to the superior
court.
|
| |
|
D. Introduction of certified prior conviction allowed without requiring corroboration evidence or live witness testimony. |
“In
any prosecution commenced pursuant
to this section, introduction into
evidence of a prior conviction or prior
finding of sufficient facts by either
original court papers or certified
attested copy of original court papers,
accompanied by a certified attested
copy of the biographical and informational
data from official probation office
records, shall be prima facie evidence
that a defendant has been convicted
previously or assigned to an alcohol
or controlled substance education,
treatment, or rehabilitation program
because of a like offense by court
of the commonwealth one or more times
preceding the date of commission of
the offense for which said defendant
is being prosecuted.”
|
“In any prosecution commenced pursuant to this section,introduction into evidence of a prior conviction or prior finding of sufficient facts by either certified attested copies of original court papers,or certified attested copies of the defendant’s
biographical and informational data from
records of the department ofprobation,
any jail or house of corrections, the
departmentof corrections, or the registry,
shall be prima facie evidencethat the defendant before the court had
been convicted previously or assigned
to an alcohol or controlled substanceeducation,
treatment, or rehabilitation program
by a courtof the commonwealth or any
other jurisdiction. Such documentation shall be self-authenticating and admissible,after the commonwealth has established the defendant’s guilt on the primary offense, as evidence in any court of the commonwealth to prove the defendant’s
commission of any prior convictions described
therein. The Commonwealth shallnot be
required to introduce additional corroborating
evidence,nor live witness testimony to
establish the validity of suchprior convictions.
|
E. Chapter 90, section 24 (f) (1): Period of suspension for breathalyzer refusal: Melanie’s bill dramatically increases the suspension period for subsequent breathalyzer refusals. |
Old Law |
New Law |
1st offense refusal = 180 day loss
of license
2nd offense refusal (or 1st refusal
if under 21 years) = 1 year loss
of license
3rd offense refusal = 18 months
loss of license
|
1st offense refusal = 180 day loss of license
2nd offense refusal = 3 year loss of license
3rd offense refusal = 5 year loss of license
4th or subsequent offense refusal = lifetime loss of license
Refusal after previous conviction under Chapter 90, section 24L = 10 year loss of license
Refusal after previous conviction under
Chapter 90, section 24G or Chapter 265,
section 13 ½ = lifetime loss of
license
|
F. Immediate suspension upon request: Melanie’s bill eliminates the 15-day temporary license. A defendant’s license is immediately suspended upon written notice from a police officer.
G. Impoundment of defendant’s vehicle: A defendant’s vehicle will be impounded for 12 hours following arrest.
Chapter 90, section 24D:
A. Aggravated OUI: The second offenders program is now required on all defendant’s age 17-21 charged with a first offense whose blood alcohol is .20 or greater.
B. List of approved alcohol education programs: The Department of Public Health will publish a list of approved education programs annually.
Chapter 90, section 24G: Melanie’s bill increases the length of license suspension from 10 years to 15 years for a conviction of Motor Vehicle homicide.
|
| Old Law |
New Law |
Chapter 90, section 24G(a) = 10 year loss of license
Chapter 90, section 24G(b) = 10 year
loss of license
|
Chapter 90, section 24G(a) = 15 years loss of license

Chapter 90, section 24G(b) = 15 years loss of license
|
Chapter 90, section 24Q: Mandatory Alcohol Assessment
Melanie’s bill requires the following defendant’s to submit to an alcohol assessment as a mandatory condition for a sentence:
|
Offense Required |
Alcohol Assessment |
1st offense with a .20 or higher
2nd or subsequent OUI offense
Prior conviction under C. 265,
section 13 ½
Prior conviction under C. 24G
Prior conviction under C. 24L
|
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
Chapter 90, section 24R(a) + (b): Mandatory lifetime loss of license for a conviction for Motor Vehicle Homicide or Manslaughter by Motor Vehicle With prior OUI: Melanie’s bill makes it a lifetime loss of license for anyone charged with an offense under Chapter 90, section 24G or Chapter 265, section 13 ½ if there is a prior conviction for on the defendant’s
record for OUI.
*The legislative intent was to create
a mandatory lifetime loss of license
for a conviction of OUI with a prior
conviction for MVH or Manslaughter
MV conviction on the record OR for
a conviction of MVH or Manslaughter
MC with prior convictions for OUI;
however, the language in this section
does not appear to accomplish this.
Chapter
90, section 24S: Ignition Interlock
Device: The following new offenses have been created: |
| Offense |
Penalty |
| Driving without an ignition interlock device when required to by law |
180 days – 2 ½ years HOC or 2 ½ - 5 years state prison with a 150 day minimum mandatory sentence and $1,000-$15,000 fine |
| Tampering with an ignition interlock device |
6 months – 2 ½ years HOC or 3-5 years
state prison |
Starting an ignition interlock device
for a restricted person, 1st offense |
6 months- 2 ½ years HOC
and $1,000-$5,000 fine
 |
Starting an ignition interlock device
for a restricted person, 2nd offense or Subsequent offense |
3-5 years in state prison
 |
|
|
Chapter 90, section 24V: Child Endangerment while Operating a Motor Vehicle:
Melanie’s bill creates a new law of child endangerment for any person charged with an alcohol related driving offense with a child 14 years of age or younger in the vehicle.
|
| Offense |
Penalty |
1st offense
2nd or subsequent offense
|
90 days – 2 ½ years and $1,000-$5,000 fine; 1 year loss of license
6 months – 2 ½ years HOC or 3-5 years state prison. 6 months minimum mandatory sentence; 3 years loss of license
|
* Sentence to be served consecutively and concurrently with predicate sentence.
Chapter
90, section 24W: Forfeiture of motor
vehicle after conviction for 4th
offense or higher. This
law allows prosecutors to file for
forfeiture of motor vehicle for any
defendant convicted of a 4th alcohol
related driving offense (or higher)
(restrictions apply). The District Attorney’s
Office receives a portion of the
proceeds from the sale.
Chapter
90, section 24X: Registration cancelled
for suspension period after conviction
for 3rd offense or higher. This law allows the registry to cancel the registration plates during the license suspension period for anyone convicted of a 3rd alcohol related driving offense (or higher).
Chapter 266, section 139: Motor Vehicle or trailers; defacement, etc.; of identifying numbers; penalties; arrest. The
following language is included in this
chapter and sections
“Whoever takes and carries away the registration plate that is attached to the vehicle of another or is assigned by the registry of motor vehicles to another shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 ½ years,
or both.”
Chapter
265, section 13 ½: Manslaughter
by Motor Vehicle
This law creates a new crime of Manslaughter by Motor Vehicle. The language essentially says, whoever commits manslaughter while operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs shall be guilty of Manslaughter by Motor Vehicle.
|
Offense License |
Penalty |
Loss of |
Manslaughter and under
the influence of alcohol
or drugs
|
5-20 years state prison and fine of not more than $25,000. 5 year minimum mandatory sentence
|
“any extended period up to life.” Allows for an appeal of the registrar’s
decision to the superior court.
|
|
Manslaughter
by Motor Vehicle vs. Felony Motor Vehicle
Homicide- What is the difference?
The only difference between felony Motor Vehicle Homicide and the new offense of Manslaughter by Motor Vehicle is the enhanced sentencing.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Melanie’s Bill took effect immediately upon signing Friday, October 28, 2005. However,
the following provisions do not go
into effect until January 1, 2006:
|
 |
1. Chapter 90, section 12- employing or allowing unlicensed operator to operate motor vehicle
2. Ignition interlock Devices
3. Mandatory alcohol assessment
4. 17-21 year old .20 or higher required to attend a second offender’s program.
|
|
<<Back to Legislative Activity
<<<Back to Government Affairs |
|
| |
|
|
Child Passenger Safety Legislation Will Go Before the Senate |
A booster seat bill filed by Sen. Steven Baddour, (D-Methuen), has emerged from the Joint committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security with a favorable report, and is awaiting a date on the Senate Calendar. The bill was re-filed on behalf of AAA Southern New England designed to strengthen existing laws governing how, and through what age, a child can and should be reasonably restrained while traveling as a passenger in a motor vehicle. Similar legislation was filed on behalf of the Club during the past two legislative sessions, however, the bills stalled each time, failing to emerge from further review prior to the expiration of the sessions.
The new
proposal, which mirrors the preceding legislation, would increase the booster
seat age requirements through seven, and impose a 4’9” minimum height
requirement, if approved by the full House and Senate.
Representative Timothy Toomey (D-Cambridge) filed the legislation on behalf of AAA Southern New England. The Bill did receive the approval of the House Committee on Public Safety and went before the House of Representatives for discussion and vote. The legislation will then move forward to the Senate.
If you agree with AAA Southern New England, Children's Hospital, NHTSA, the National Transportation Safety Board, Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, the Massachusetts Medical Society, bill sponsor Representative Timothy Toomey (D-Cambridge), and the American Academy of Pediatrics, that Massachusetts needs a booster seat law, then contact your state representative, senator, and the governor.
For a complete list of legislators, districts and phone numbers go to
Massachusetts House of Representatives and Massachusetts Senators.
Or contact Arthur Kinsman, Director of Government Affairs,
AAA-Southern New England at 617-723-0890.
<<Back to Legislative Activity
<<<Back to Government Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
After the tragic deaths of two AAA towing contractors last year, AAA asked Rep. Brad Hill (R-Ipswich) to file a bill designed to protect both our tow truck drivers and our AAA members who are receiving roadside assistance.
HB 1997...
Imposes fines of at least five hundred dollars for failure to exercise caution while approaching tow trucks flashing amber lights; imposes fines of at least one thousand dollars and a term of imprisonment up to two years when negligent driving causes injuries to tow truck drivers and/or stranded motorists.
The bill is currently being considered by the Committee
on Transportation.”
<<Back to Legislative Activity
<<<Back to Government Affairs |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
©2008 AAA Southern New England, all rights reserved
|
| |
|